Today Samsung announced a new mid-range SoC called the Exynos 7870. The new SKU sports 8x Cortex A53s running at up to 1.6GHz. The GPU should be an ARM Mali T830 although we have no information on core-count or frequencies used. The part extends Samsung's ModAP lineup of SoCs with integrated modems as we see an integrated UE Category 6 modem integrated, delivering up to 300Mbps with FDD-TDD joint carrier aggregation.
Upcoming 14nm Mid-Range SoCs
SoCExynos 7580Exynos 7870Snapdragon 625
(MSM8953)
CPU8x A53 @ 1.6GHz8x A53 @ 1.6GHz4x A53 @ 2.0GHz

4x A53 @ ? GHz
GPUMali T720MP3
@ 600MHz
Mali T830MP?Adreno 506
Encode/
Decode
1080p60
H.264 
2160p
H.264 & HEVC (Decode)
Camera/ISPDual ISP
16MP / (8+8)
Dual ISP
16MP / (8+8)
Dual ISP
24MP
Integrated
Modem
Cat. 6
300Mbps DL ?Mbps UL

2x20MHz C.A.
Cat. 6
300Mbps DL ?Mbps UL

2x20MHz C.A.
"X9 LTE" Cat. 7
300Mbps DL 150Mbps UL

2x20MHz C.A. 
(DL & UL)
Mfc. Process28nm HKMG14nm14nm LPP
More interestingly, is that the new SoC is manufactured on a 14nm FinFET process which promises to reduce power consumption by over 30% over similar SoCs such as the Exynos 7580. Only a few days ago we were discussing our surprise with the introduction of Qualcomm's Snapdragon 625 which is also manufactured in a 14nm LPP process, a great sign for the manufacturing process given that these mid-range parts are very price-sensitive. Samsung discloses that the Exynos 7870 will be in mass production in the first quarter of 2016 so we're essentially very close to device availability in the following months.

Microsoft this week began to accept applications for pre-orders for its HoloLens augmented reality device. Right now, the company offers HoloLens only to software developers looking to build applications for this new environment.Interested developers will have to pay $3000 per unit for this development kit, which is a hefty sum. Moreover, additional technical specifications of HoloLens revealed by Microsoft give us a bit of insight into what is inside this augmented reality wearable.
The Microsoft HoloLens is custom-built wearable personal computer running Windows 10 operating system. The HoloLens is based on an undisclosed 32-bit Intel processor and a custom-designed Microsoft holographic processing unit (HPU) that processes data from multiple sensors. In fact, the list of HoloLens’ sensors is very impressive: the device features one 2 MP video camera, an inertial measurement unit (which means, a set of accelerometers, gyroscopes and maybe even a magnetometer), one depth camera, four environment understanding cameras, four microphones, an ambient light sensor as well as mixed reality capture IC. Since the mixed-reality headset does not use any markers or extra cameras to track movement that are located outside of itself, a sophisticated set of sensors inside it is absolutely required.The HoloLens can track gaze, understand gestures and voice commands thanks to its sensors and underlying software.
The device is equipped with 2 GB of RAM (1GB for the processor and 1GB for the HPU) as well as 64 GB of NAND flash storage. The HoloLens can connect to the Internet or other devices using Wi-Fi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 4.1 LE wireless technologies. In addition, the device is equipped with a Micro-USB 2.0 port, a 3.5 mm audio jack and a surround sound system. The HoloLens can operate for two or three hours on one charge, which is not a lot, but its unlikely you would be wearing this around for a work day. It can also charge while in use, tethering it somewhat but allowing developers to test applications on it as they work.
The AR headset from Microsoft uses its advanced sensors to track the position and orientation of the user's head relative to their surroundings. The system attempts to predict position where the user's head will be in at the exact moment and applies holograms accordingly. Microsoft makes a number of recommendations to software makers how to ensure that the hologram is added to the right place at the right time, but the system constantly monitors not only data from sensors, but also adjusts the length of the rendering pipeline.

Last month I published my review of the Pixel C. While I thought it was a very interesting tablet, in the end I was unable to give it any sort of recommendation due to the severe software bugs that were present. To me, this was quite surprising, as Google has a relatively good track record when it comes to the software on the Nexus devices. During the review process I reached out to Google to voice my concerns about the issues. What both concerns me and gives me hope for the Pixel C is that Google was readily aware of most of the problems I brought up. It concerns me because I think the appropriate decision would have been to delay its release, but it gives me hope that these issues will be fixed. 
During my discussions with Google, I was offered the chance to test a new unit that would run a new unreleased build containing fixes that Google planned to release to the public in the future. Given the fact that the Pixel C has solid hardware that's only let down by buggy software, the chance to see Google's improvements before they are officially released presented a great opportunity to revisit the Pixel C and determine if Google's upcoming changes can change my original verdict about the device. It seems that instead of releasing a large patch, Google has instead included these fixes with their February security bundle for the Pixel C. With it, the build number has changed from MXB48J to MXB48T, and we're looking at a slightly newer version of the Linux kernel.
Before getting into my testing and experiences with this updated Pixel C, it's worth going over the major issues that I identified during my initial review. By far the most significant problem was the dysfunctional touch input. Taps wouldn't register, swipes wouldn't register or would register as taps, and in general the touch screen was just not usable. This is something that Google was aware of, and has claimed to address in this new firmware. The second big issue was the stability and performance of the software. I encounted so many app crashes and entire OS crashes that I ended up losing a page of the review that I was writing on the Pixel C, and I was forced to abandon any attempts to do so due to the high likelyhood of it occurring again. 
While the app and OS crashes seemed to happen at random, there were two very important applications that consistently had problems. The first was PCMark, and the second was our build of GFXBench with an infinite battery test. PCMark consistently crashed at some point during its battery test, leading me to abandon my attempts to get a final result after having the test crash several times. GFXBench presented an issue where the detection of charging would cause the test to stop. I suspected that this related to the inductive charging used for the keyboard, but I couldn't confirm it.
The purpose of this article is to take a look at the new Pixel C unit provided by Google, and compare it to the one sent for the original review with the launch firmware. The main area of focus will be Google's work to fix the performance, touch input, and connectivity problems, along with some comparions that we rarely get to do due to the nature of single device sourcing. After looking at the areas where Google has made improvements, along with the areas where work is still needed, I've be able to reevaluate my original verdict on the Pixel C, and hopefully the changes will be enough to make it a tablet that is worth recommending.
Foxconn Technology Group, the world’s largest contract maker of consumer electronics, announced on on Wednesday that they have officially acquired Sharp, a major maker of LCD panels and various electronics from Japan. The two companies have collaborated for many years and Foxconn took over Sharp’s television factories in Mexico, China and Malaysia as well as a stake in the company in 2012. This week Foxconn gained full control of Sharp.
Foxconn (which is also known as Hon Hai Precision Industry) plans to pay ¥389 billion ($3.5 billion) for a 66% stake of Sharp, which is ¥100 billion less than was originally negotiated a month ago. That deal in February fell apart because Foxconn learnt about substantial financial liabilities that Sharp had. In the future, Foxconn will have to pay ¥100 billion ($889 million) more to get preferred stock from Sharp’s main banks and then pay liabilities that Sharp has, reports Bloomberg news-agency. Sharp has to pay Mizuho Financial Group and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group approximately ¥510 billion (4.53 billion) in the coming months. Besides, Sharp expects to report an operating loss of ¥170 billion ($1.511 billion) for the fiscal year, which ends on Thursday. In short, Foxconn’s total spending on Sharp will be significantly higher than $3.5 billion, but the prize that the contract manufacturer gets may be worth it.
Terry Guo, the founder and chairman of Foxconn, hopes that the acquisition of Sharp will get his company a number of significant assets: a well-known consumer electronics brand with a good product lineup, LCD display production capacities and intellectual property.
“I am thrilled by the prospects for this strategic alliance and I look forward to working with everyone at Sharp,” said Terry Gou. “We have much that we want to achieve and I am confident that we will unlock Sharp’s true potential and together reach great heights.”
The buyout of Sharp will transform Foxconn into a major producer of display panels. As a result, it will be able to offer more products and services to its customers, including Apple. Right now Apple fetches LCD panels for its iPhones and iPads from companies like Japan Display Inc. (JDI), LG Display and Samsung Display. If Foxconn manages to offer the right technology at the right price to Apple, then it may get itself a new multi-billion dollar business. In fact, even if for some reason the current deal between Foxconn and Sharp fells apart before October 5, the Taiwan-based company will be given an opportunity to buy only the display business from Sharp. However, to capitalize on the display business in the long term, Foxconn will have to ensure that Sharp is able to produce OLED panels in addition to LCDs since the former are getting more popular.
While contract production of electronics is what made Foxconn big and strong, the competition against companies like Flextronics, Pegatron, Quanta and others is intense. Profit margins of Foxconn has shrunk in the recent years and in a bid to cut-down its costs the company had to start using robots in its factories. Automatization of manufacturing helped Foxconn to increase its profits last year, but selling own-brand goods is generally significantly more profitable than producing hardware for others. But branded products will be a new business for Foxconn. Thanks to its volume of scale, abilities to fetch components in high volume and at favorable prices, the company may significantly reduce costs of Sharp’s electronics, which will help to increase their market share. In the recent years, Foxconn also entered the markets of system-on-chips and software (by acquiring Socle and collaborating with software makers like Mozilla), which further adds to its product building expertise. At the same time, production of branded devices may make Foxconn a competitor to at least some of its clients. For example, Sharp’s smartphones compete fiercely against Apple’s iPhone in Japan and still control a sizeable chunk of the market.
Sharp’s intellectual property is particularly important to build next-generation displays and therefore Foxconn is interested in getting it. In addition, Sharp probably has a lot of patents in the field of consumer electronics, communications and software, which will come in handy when Foxconn starts to produce its own devices or develop products for others (as an ODM).
Sharp was founded in 1912 in Tokyo, Japan, by Tokuji Hayakawa. The company got its name after the ever-sharp mechanical pencil, which was invented by Mr. by Hayakawa. Sharp made the world’s first LCD calculator in 1973 and the world’s first phone with camera in 2000. Most recently Sharp began to sell the world’s first commercial UHD TV with 8K resolution (7320×4680) and was among the major driving forces behind this new tech. Unfortunately, strong yen, competition against South Korea-based CE makers and other factors significantly affected Sharp’s abilities to capitalize on its leading-edge technologies in the recent years. With Foxconn’s money and expertize in mass production, Sharp may become a much more significant maker of CE than it is today.
“If you are talking about two years, it will be difficult. Three years, there is potential. Five years, then definitely,” said Kylie Huang, analyst with Daiwa-Cathay Capital Markets, reports Reuters news-agency.
Financial analysts generally praised the deal, but admitted that Foxconn will have to invest in Sharp going forward in a bid to unlock the potential of the consumer electronics company.
“This is positive for Sharp, although it’s hard to imagine that Foxconn won’t have to keep providing funds,” said Hideki Yasuda, an analyst at Ace Research Institute.
Images by Apple, Bloomberg, Foxconn.
We’ve reviewed Huawei Honor devices before, but by and large they were designed to target China and similar markets. There were also a number of growing pains as seen in our Huawei Honor 6 review. However, in the time since that review Huawei has done quite a bit of growing up when it comes to resolving some of their weaknesses and improving upon their strengths. Their Kirin SoCs started off with some notable issues in implementations, but with the Kirin 950 we’ve seen a major leap in performance and power efficiency. To keep their momentum going, Huawei Honor is bringing their first phone to the US, the Honor 5X.
 Huawei Honor 5X
SoCQualcomm Snapdragon 615 1.5/1.2 GHz 4x4 A53
RAM2GB
NAND16GB + microSD
Display5.5" 1920x1080 IPS LCD
Dimensions151.3mm x 76.3mm x 8.15mm; 158g
Camera13MP Rear Facing f/2.0 28mm equivalent IMX214
5MP Front Facing f/2.4 22mm equivalent OV5648
Battery3000 mAh (11.4Wh)
OSAndroid 5.1.1 EmUI 3.1
Connectivity802.11 b/g/n 2.4 GHz Only, Bluetooth 4.1, GPS/GNSS, Micro USB 2.0
Network2G / 3G / 4G LTE Category 4
The basic specs aren’t really going to be all that fascinating at this point as Snapdragon 615 is a known quantity. Huawei continues their trend of shipping odd WiFi configurations as this device only supports 2.4 GHz 802.11b/g/n WiFi. The rear camera is a rather well-understood Sony IMX214 sensor and the front camera sensor is a similarly common OmniVision OV5648 sensor.
However, the Honor 5X actually manages to hit the right point for price and features. The display is a 5.5” 1080p LCD, with an aluminum unibody design. There’s also the usual dual SIM capabilities along a decently sized battery and an FPC1020 fingerprint scanner shared with the Ascend Mate7. At 200 USD, this has the potential to beat out the Moto G for best value smartphone in that price range.
Subjectively, the in-hand feel and overall build quality is shockingly good for the price. The Ascend P8 Lite that we reviewed last year was pretty much par for the course when it came to materials and in-hand feel for a ~200 USD phone, so to go from some rather hard and cheap-feeling plastic to an aluminum unibody that is basically comparable to the HTC One M9 in feel is quite a leap in the course of less than a year. The comparison to the One M9 is rather apt in this case, as the design of the phone is such that the phone has a brushed finish that can be seen, but not really felt in the hand.
Unfortunately, the performance of the Honor 5X is a bit wanting. I suspect that Cortex A53s alone aren’t quite enough to get the amount of performance needed to make Android run perfectly smooth, as while in some cases the phone was perfectly smooth in some transitions like opening and closing app folders I saw noticeable frame drops and similar issues.
Casual use of the fingerprint scanner was also quite impressive, as the Honor 5X behaves pretty much identically to the Ascend Mate7 in how the fingerprint scanner will automatically detect and scan a fingerprint even when the screen is off, so with fingerprint unlock set up it’s possible to unlock the phone by simply placing a finger over the fingerprint scanner and waiting for the phone to wake up and unlock automatically.
As previously mentioned, Huawei is selling the Honor 5X for 199.99 USD. It will be available for preorder starting January 6th, and will have general availability starting January 31st on HiHonor.com and Amazon. Although it would have really been exciting to see something like Snapdragon 650 show up in this phone, at the price it’s going it could be a viable option if Huawei has managed to nail down the details without show-stopping issues.
Today HTC announced that they are launching a number of devices in their Desire smartphone line in the United States. In order, the newly available smartphones are the HTC Desire 520, HTC Desire 526, HTC Desire 626, and the HTC Desire 626s. All of these devices expand HTC's product line in the low-end section of the smartphone market, and you can check out their specifications in the chart below.
DeviceHTC Desire 520HTC Desire 526HTC Desire 626HTC Desire 626s
SoCQualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
4 x Cortex A7 at 1.1GHz
Adreno 304 at 400MHz
NAND / RAM8GB / 1GB8GB / 1.5GB16GB / 1.5GB8GB / 1GB
MicroSDMicroSDXC up to 2TB
Thickness9.05mm9.9mm8.19mm8.19mm
Display4.5" 854x480 LCD4.7" 960x540 LCD5.0" 1280x720 LCD5.0" 1280x720 LCD
Camera8MP Rear
2MP Front
8MP Rear
2MP Front
8MP Rear
5MP Front
8MP Rear
2MP Front
Battery2000 mAh (7.6Wh)
Connectivity802.11 b/g/n + BT 4.1, GNSS, microUSB2.0
OSAndroid 5.1 With HTC Sense
As you can see from the chart, all four of these devices are fairly similar as far as specifications go. All use Qualcomm's Snapdragon 210 SoC, which is the first time to my recollection that we've seen this part show up in smartphones. Snapdragon 210 is a quad core Cortex A7 part with a peak frequency of 1.1GHz, which makes it slightly slower than Qualcomm's Snapdragon 400 parts. On the GPU side, the Adreno 304 GPU is just a variant of Adreno 305 with a max frequency of 400MHz. All of the devices have 8GB of NAND, with the exception of the Desire 626 which has 16GB. On the DRAM side, the Desire 520 and 626s have 1GB of RAM, while the Desire 526 and 626 bump that to 1.5GB. All four phones also have the same 7.6Wh battery capacity, and they all share an 8MP rear camera, with everything except the 5MP Desire 626 also sharing a 2MP front-facing camera.
The major point where these four devices differ is their display size and resolution. The Desire 520 is at the low end of the range with its 4.5" 854x480 display, followed by the 960x540 Desire 526, and the 5.0" 1280x720 Desire 626 and 626s. Since the 626 and 626s are larger with the same battery capacity they are thinner than the 520 and 526. Interestingly enough, the Desire 526 is almost 1mm thicker than the 520 despite its larger screen size.
The Desire 626 and 626s will be available in all the colors you see in the cover image above. The Desire 526 comes in black, while the Desire 520 will come in grey. As far as availability goes, HTC says that these devices will be available in a variety of colors from both prepaid and postpaid US carriers. Specifically named operators include AT&T, Boost Mobile, Cricket, MetroPCS, Sprint, T-Mobile, Tracfone, Verizon, and Virgin Mobile USA. T-Mobile is curiously missing from the list. According to HTC, providers will confirm which models and colors they're carrying beginning this week, and they will be available in the coming months.